HO-6 Coverage
People in
the condominium association insurance field have long suggested that individual unit owner coverage should be
mandatory. It is not, you know. In addition, while many Association’s governing documents require the
individual owner to obtain their own policy, Boards find enforcing these types of insurance requirements
problematic. A study suggests that as many as 25% of condominium
unit owners fail to purchase their own coverage. Perhaps that fact
alone explains why, until recently, little attention has been paid to the quality of coverage the HO-6 policy
provides. Of course the “the devil is in the details” – and at the
time of loss it is nuances in the HO-6 policy language which severely impacts the quality of protection granted
the unit owner.
HIGHER
DEDUCTIBLES HAVE ILLUMINATED THE PROBLEM
The recent
hard insurance market, runaway claims due to higher repair expenses, and years of deferred maintenance – have
all combined to result in Associations maintaining significantly higher deductibles on their Master
Policy. Some Boards have adopted this as a voluntary risk
management step while others have been forced to accept a higher deductible by their insurance company as a
condition of their renewal. The result means that thousands of
dollars of losses are no longer covered by the Master Policy -- shifting much of the burden to the individual
owners. This shift has really illuminated the lack of consistency
and uniformity of the underlying HO-6 policies. Not all HO-6
policies have the same scope of coverage and, as a result, the protection they provide for the individual unit
owner at the time of loss may vary greatly.
What can
individual unit owner do to obtain the best, most comprehensive HO-6 policy? First and foremost, be an informed consumer.
There at
least three different areas in which HO-6 policies respond differently, depending on the carrier:
1. The
Master Policy Deductible - If the loss occurred as a result of the unit owner’s negligence (grease fire in the
kitchen, overflow of a tub or toilet), many Boards will hold the individual unit owner responsible for the
deductible. This also would hold true for losses that fall below
the deductible. Does the individual unit owner’s HO-6 policy cover
this deductible? What about a loss that doesn’t quite reach a
master policy deductible of, say, $10,000? Would the HO-6 policy
still cover the loss?
A Master
Policy deductible of $10,000 or greater (per occurrence) is not unusual, with many homeowners associations
maintaining a $25,000 or even $50,000 deductible for resulting water damage losses.
Unfortunately, many HO-6 policies limit
the coverage of the Master policy deductible to only $1,000. Still
other policies may indicate that they will cover the $10,000 deductible, for example, but if the loss falls
below the deductible, they may opt not to cover the loss, citing the “other insurance provision*” contained in
the policy which indicates that the HO-6 is secondary to any other collectible insurance and that the Master
Policy would have responded – be it not for the $10,000 deductible.
(*Note the underlying HO-6 contains the following statement: “This insurance shall be excess over other
insurance in the name of the condominium covering the same property covered by this policy.” It is the “same property” language in this statement that is particularly
problematic. It’s as if the carrier is saying, “the broader the
coverage provided by the Master Policy, then, the less coverage we’ll provide on our policy.”) This is a frustrating wrinkle as it appears that it is not so much the policy
language as much as claims adjusters (or their superiors) interpretation of their own policies.
This type
of response from a carrier is unacceptable. There are carriers out
there that will provide higher limits of coverage for the Master Policy deductible and will provide coverage for
damage that occurs within the interior of the unit if it falls below the Master Policy
deductible. Communicate your expectations with your
agent/broker. If he/she is unable to obtain comprehensive
coverage for the deductible – or cannot assure you how the claims office will handle losses that fall below
the deductible -- keep looking!
2. The
Special Assessment - What types of special assessments will be covered by the Loss Assessment coverage provided
by the HO-6 policy?
The type
of special assessments that will be covered by an HO-6 varies widely from carrier to carrier. The most basic (and limited) form of Loss Assessment coverage provides
protection only for special assessments resulting from the same perils provided by the underlying H0-6
itself. This would typically include the standard “named perils”
perils (fire, lightning, wind, hail, et al) plus the liability coverage (bodily injury or property
damage). The better HO-6 policies broaden their coverage to pick up
special assessments resulting from a personal injury claim (libel, slander, defamation of character, or invasion
of rights of privacy). Some HO-6 policies will even cover a special
assessment that resulted from an error in judgment committed by the Board of Directors. This latter coverage would be provided by the Directors & Officers
Liability policy maintained by the Association that would seemingly make this coverage only important if the
Board were sued in an amount in excess of the coverage maintained, or there were multiple occurrences that had
exhausted their coverage limit. Finally, some policies will even
cover a special assessment that results from discrimination claims levied against the
Association. While this form excludes any fines or penalties
imposed by law, this is still a policy with rather exceptional coverage.
3. Real
Property coverage -To what extent of Real Property coverage is provided? (e.g., building alteration, additions, fixtures, installations, or items of
real property that are a part of the unit as defined by the governing documents)?
The
process of “dovetailing” the HO-6 policy --- successfully tailoring an HO-6 policy that will pick up the
interior improvements at the precise point where the Master Policy stops --- has always been
tricky. One has to read the Master Policy carefully and analyze
where the Master Policy ceases and where the unit owner policy should truly begin. It becomes even more tricky if the Master Policy “points” to the governing
documents when detailing what coverage is provided the association, as the agent/broker must now interpret
not only another carrier’s policy language, but also the CC&Rs for the Association.
The
process can also become more complex if the Master Policy’s scope of coverage was reduced as a result of the
carrier’s underwriting attempts to keep on the risk by limiting or reducing the type of property it covers at
the time of loss. Hence, we will see Master Policies that were
“single entity” or “all-in” at inception that became scaled back to “original builder’s specs” or “bare walls”
policies at the time of renewal.
As a
result, a condominium resident will want to not only obtain as broad a definition of “real property” as possible
(to cover any improvements that may not be covered by the Master Policy), but also to obtain sufficient limits
to cover any improvements made by the unit owner and the unit’s previous owners.
Because
the language contained in the individual unit owner policy can often not be changed or modified, some
duplication of coverage may be unavoidable. It is always best to
err on the conservative side and maintain a broader scope of coverage and perhaps more coverage than may be
necessary – in the event that the Master Policy (which likely has a different renewal date) is changed or
modified during the HO-6’s policy term and responds differently than intended.
As in any
purchase involving condominium insurance, it is best to buy individual unit owner coverage from an agent or
broker who specializes in coverage for condominiums and is familiar with the intricacies of fitting the two
policies (HO-6 and Master Policy) together. Obtaining as much
information as possible about the Master Policy will help you in obtaining individual coverage – and once you
have that information, obtain as broad of protection individually as you can reasonably afford.
|