Sharpening
Your Legal Writing Skills
As Benjamin
Franklin wrote in Poor Richard’s Almanac, “You may delay, but Time will not.” Lawyers often write more and under greater time constraints than many
journalists, novelists, and other professionals. They write under
the pressure of relentless deadlines and the need to communicate successfully to the most demanding and
impatient of all readers—judges and other lawyers. To survive,
lawyers need a consistent, efficient plan for structuring the analysis or argument, and then drafting and
editing. They need to understand writing as a staged process
similar to building a house.
Legal writing
is a practical tool dependent on major principles and minor rules.
The principles, which must be embraced and followed in every memorandum or brief, can be reduced to four:
constantly consider the reader, point first at every level, make the client’s story compelling, and combine the
five types of law.
Constantly
consider the reader
Your readers
are busy judges, judges’ law clerks, and supervising attorneys in your firm. They want the goods: analysis and argument that meet their expectations for
normal legal writing. Virtually every first year law student learns
the mantra of Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion because it teaches the normal syllogistic structure of
legal analysis and argument. Since virtually all legal analyses and
arguments can be structured with a syllogism, much legal writing follows this form. Using this form to deliver the goods to a law-trained reader will meet that
busy reader’s expectations. So, when organizing any analysis or
argument, keep readers’ needs constantly in mind. Whenever
possible, use a syllogistic structure to deliver the goods.
Point
first at every level
Effective
legal writing is a “pointed text.” Begin the memorandum or brief
with an issue statement, whether titled Introduction or Preliminary Statement. This section provides a succinct overview that sharply focuses the dispositive
issues in the same order as the analysis or argument to come. The
sections that follow then develop each major issue or contention.
Just as each major section of the analysis or argument delivers the goods up front, every part within the
section—paragraph and sentence—also should make the point first.
Law-trained readers expect point first at every level. This
principle assures readers from the outset the memo or brief will be easy to parse and understand after the first
reading.
Make the
client’s story compelling
Law school is
mostly about the law; law practice is mostly about the facts. Since
the facts of each case are unique, tell your client’s story. Always
include a Statement of Facts and, depending on the case, sometimes provide a Procedural History. Facts persuade and form the basis for effective storytelling. Cognitive psychologists have shown experimentally that most people do not
think effectively in abstract general propositions. Rather, most
people understand concepts best when they are expressed in the form of stories.
Few lawyers
have ever been taught how to tell a compelling story; a few tips will make a considerable
difference. First, find a theme, a proposition about the nature
and meaning of what happened. Think of the theme in
Shakespeare’s play, Macbeth: An ambitious general, pressured by his more ambitious wife, assassinates
the king but wears the crown only briefly as he is haunted and cornered by his own violent death. Distill the theme of your client’s story, and build the story around it.
Since the rules prohibit explicit arguments or conclusory
language, you must arrange the facts artfully. Describe them so
readers draw inferences favorable to your client. Artful
arrangement requires four decisions: Whose point of view? Where
to begin? Where to end? Which facts to emphasize, which to downplay, and which “nonfacts” to
include? Making those decisions consciously and strategically
will produce a persuasive, compelling drama rather than a mundane chronology. In effect, an artful Statement of Fact is a powerful argument because it
moves readers emotionally as well as logically to see the case your client’s way.
Combine
the five types of law
One difference between novices and
experienced lawyers is the latter habitually combine two or more of the five types of law: text, intent, case
precedent, equity, and public policy. The five types provide a
checklist for lawyers who are drafting briefs. Analysis or argument
based on text considers the plain meaning of the constitution, statute, or other legal document. Intent is based
on the purpose of the text, the legislative intent, or, in a contract, the mutual intent of the
parties.
Case
precedent, the most common type, provides the rule as illustrated, which is either analogized or
distinguished. Equity is a broad type including tradition,
morality, and fundamental fairness. Finally, public policy is based
on a prediction about social effects, an analysis, or argument about how the law will affect the
public.
Each of the
five types provides a major premise for a syllogistic analysis or argument. In the context of trial court litigation, the five types form a hierarchy,
with text, intent, and case precedent controlling. Therefore, if
the statutory text is directly on point or the leading case precedent applies, the trial court is bound to
decide accordingly. Still, the best advocates combine arguments
based on equity or public policy for maximum persuasive impact.
Similarly, a comprehensive analysis includes two or more types of law.
If you do
not keep it awfully simple, it will become simply awful
The practical
tools for clear and concise legal writing also rely on numerous rules, but most depend on the
context. Some rules are points about style. Others pertain to grammar or punctuation. And some are techniques for formatting and organizing. Remembering a few general rules can invariably produce clear writing that is
easy to read. Certain grammar and syntax rules have particular
importance for legal writing, but since even these few cannot be adequately taught in a short article, study one
of the many excellent books on this subject. One of the most useful
is Richard Wydick’s famous treatise, Plain English for Lawyers. A
few years ago, a lawyer said that Wydick’s book got him through the bar exam. He had failed the essay part the first time, so during his next preparation,
he worked through every exercise in Plain English for Lawyers. His writing skills made a quantum leap. Yours will, too.
Keep
sentences short
Concision is
a mark of confidence, a hallmark of the best legal writing, and many judges wholeheartedly agree. Keep it short, not just sentences, which should average about 25 words, but
also paragraphs, which should measure about half a page.
Prefer the
active voice
Readers
appreciate active voice sentences where they can quickly find the actor and the action without hacking through a
thicket of clauses and qualifiers: “The court denied the motion” rather than “It was decided that the motion
would not be granted.” “Counsel argued the gun was inadmissible”
rather than “It was argued by counsel that the gun was inadmissible.” Remember the structure this way: Active people do things; passive people have
things done to them. Generally, avoid the passive voice because it
is wordy and harder to read. However, sometimes the passive is
useful, e.g., to hide the actor (“Mistakes were made”) or when the actor is irrelevant (“The Summons was served
on defendant last Tuesday”). But prefer the active voice because
“[t]he difference between an active verb style and a passive verb style—in clarity and vigor—is the difference
between life and death for a writer.”
Use verbs,
not nominalizations
“Verbs are
the most important of all your tools. They push the sentence
forward and give it momentum.” In contrast, nominalizations—nouns
created from verbs—bog down the sentence with abstractions. These
words, all-too-familiar bureaucratic lard, are the words ending with -tion, -ancy, -ment, or
-ence. Avoid them.
Edit them out by finding the verbs they bury, and use those verbs to drive the sentence
forward:
•
Conform, not be in conformity with,
•
Discuss, not contain a discussion of,
•
Amend, not make amendments to,
•
Refer, not make reference to.
Nominalizations create wordiness because
they require articles and prepositions to prop them up. The strong
verb not only moves the sentence but needs fewer words to do so.
Avoid
left-handed sentences
Avoid lengthy
phrases and clauses before the main subject and verb. The first few
words in a sentence determine readability, but lengthy preambles provide no context and make the reader work too
hard to find the main clause. Introduce with short
phrases. Similarly, move long subordinate clauses out of the
middle. Those qualifiers may be essential to precision but are
better placed at the end. Keep the main subject and verb
together.
Omit
needless words
Draft early,
and edit without mercy. Cut and condense by attacking flatulent
words and phrases:
• Unnecessary
prepositions: He edited the memo with regard to omitting needless words.
• Unnecessary
pronouns: The judge said that it was an issue that counsel should address.
• Needless
“to be” forms: He is a man who believes that there is no single method for effective editing
exists.
• Meaningless
expressions: It should be noted that there are two separate agreements.
Any survival
guide is short on long-term support. For that, you need not only
one or more of the many fine books available on legal writing but also something more important—a personal
commitment to improve your writing. With sustained effort over
time, you can achieve consistent clarity and persuasive impact.
Then you will not merely survive, you will succeed.
|