Statewide
Homeowners, Inc. v. Williams, 30 Cal.App.3d 567
[Civ.
No. 11357. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One. February 15, 1973.]
STATEWIDE
HOMEOWNERS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ELDON C. WILLIAMS, as County Assessor, etc., Defendant and
Respondent
(Opinion
by Ault, Acting P. J., with Cologne, J., and Coughlin, J., concurring.)
COUNSEL
H.
L. Young for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Robert
G. Berrey, County Counsel, and Lawrence Kapiloff, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
AULT,
Acting P. J.
Denied
permission to inspect certain documents and records in the San Diego County Assessor's Office, Statewide
Homeowners, Inc. (Statewide) petitioned for a writ of mandate in the superior court seeking an order compelling
the assessor to permit the inspection. The superior court found the assessor was not required by law to keep or
prepare the documents and records which Statewide sought to inspect and ruled they were not open to public
inspection under the provisions of section 408, subdivision (a), of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Statewide has
appealed from the judgment denying the writ.
The
facts are not disputed. The record on appeal is contained in the clerk's transcript and includes an agreed
statement of fact, the trial court's memorandum opinion, the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the
judgment.
Statewide
asserts it is attempting to conduct an independent check of the assessment process in San Diego County and wants
to compare market [30 Cal.App.3d 569] values of real property, as reflected in recent sale prices, with
the assessed values actually assigned to the properties on the next assessment roll. Statewide claims the task
is difficult because the assessment roll is arranged in parcel number sequence, according to numbers which have
been assigned to the property by the assessor. It concedes it is possible to ascertain the tax roll parcel
number for a given legal description by using the many indexes and records available to the public at the
assessor's office, but contends it would be extremely time consuming and burdensome to make the correlation for
the several thousand recent deeds and conveyances necessary to complete its general study.
The
assessor's employees have already done this same work during the preparation of the Secured Assessment Roll, and
the results of their labors are stored in files referred to as the "Final File" and the "Cut Document File."
These files contain photocopies of deeds and other documents affecting property ownership which are matters of
public record and open to public inspection at the county recorder's office. fn.
1 However, they have been processed by the records division of the assessor's office and each
one bears a notation as to the parcel number of the property affected by that particular document. The documents
which require the assignment of a new parcel number (i.e., a subdivision or lot split) are stored, when not in
use, in the "Cut Document File" and are kept for an indefinite period; the remaining documents are stored, when
not in use, in the "Final File" and are discarded annually sometime after the end of the assessment year. The
documents are arranged in parcel number sequence. Consequently, if Statewide could inspect them, it could easily
identify the sales transactions and list them in parcel number sequence for ready comparison with the Secured
Assessment Roll.
Discussion
[1]
Under the California Public Records Act (Giv. Code, § 6250 et seq.), citizens are given the right to inspect any
public record fn.
2 except one the disclosure of which is exempted by the provisions of section 6254.
Subdivision (k) of section 6254, in turn, broadly exempts from public [30 Cal.App.3d 570] inspection
"[r]ecords the disclosure of which is exempted or prohibited pursuant to provisions of federal or state law.
..."
The
Revenue and Taxation Code specifically requires the assessor to prepare and keep certain records: county maps
(Rev. & Tax. Code, § 327); records relating to claims for exemptions (Rev. & Tax. Code, §§ 251, 252,
254); certain property tax statements (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 441); an assessment roll containing certain
specified information (Rev. & Tax. Code, §§ 601, 602); and an index to the roll (Rev. & Tax. Code, §
615). It also specifically provides in subdivision (a) of section 408: "... any information and records in the
assessor's office which are not required by law to be kept or prepared by the assessor are not public documents
and shall not be open to public inspection." (Italics added.)
Statewide
contends the assessor's claim, and the superior court's finding, that the documents in the "Final File" and the
"Cut Documents File" are not records which the law requires the assessor to prepare and keep are in error. Since
the documents in both files are essential to the performance of the assessor's statutory duties, i.e.,
preparation of the assessment roll and the county property maps, it argues the law requires the assessor to
prepare the documents in the files.
Such
a narrow interpretation of the exemption provided by the code section would render the section meaningless. If
all of the information and papers accumulated and used by the assessor in the process of preparing the records
which the law requires him to prepare and keep are themselves to be regarded as records he is required to
prepare and keep, then every paper in his office would fall into the category.
We
find no provision in the law which requires the assessor to subscribe to the deed service, to make the parcel
number notations on the deeds or to maintain them in the files Statewide seeks to inspect. The documents are the
working papers by which the assessor updates the assessment roll and the county property maps which the law
requires him to prepare and keep and make available for public inspection. But the fact the assessor uses the
deeds to prepare and update the annual assessment roll and the county property maps does not make the deeds
themselves records which the law requires him to prepare and keep.
Statewide
points out the records it seeks to inspect do not contain confidential information and argues the exemption
provided by Revenue and Taxation Code section 408, subdivision (a), should not be applied to prohibit inspection
of documents which do not contain confidential information. The confidential nature of information contained in
publicly held [30 Cal.App.3d 571] documents is a proper basis for exemption from public disclosure, but
it does not necessarily follow it is the only proper basis for exemption. In any event, the statute under
consideration places exemption from public inspection on the fact the law does not require the records to be
kept, not upon confidentiality. Statewide makes no claim the statute is unconstitutional. If the section gives
broader exemption to the assessor's records than is accorded generally to other public records by the Public
Records Act, the cure lies in amendment of the statute by the Legislature and not in a strained and unrealistic
interpretation of its provisions.
Pursuant
to Evidence Code section 459, we have called to the parties' attention that Revenue and Taxation Code section
11911.1 and San Diego County Ordinance No. 3801 [New Series] (§ 22.312.1 of the San Diego County Code) were
adopted while this appeal was pending. As of January 1, 1972, the combined effect of the statute and ordinance
is to require assessor's parcel numbers on all deeds and conveyances before they can be accepted for recording
by the San Diego County Recorder. While this requirement does not make the issues raised by the appeal moot, it
does much to alleviate the problems and difficulties about which Statewide complains.
The
judgment is affirmed.
Cologne,
J., and Coughlin, J., concurred.
FN 1. The
assessor subscribes to a service provided by Security Title Insurance Company for which he receives 5" x 7" copies
of all deeds and other instruments affecting title to real property which are recorded at the county recorder's
office. Approximately 1,000 such documents are received each day.
FN 2. Public
records are broadly defined to include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public's
business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or
characteristics." (Gov. Code, § 6252, subd. (d).)
|